Comparative Report: A606 Type 4 Steel (Corten) vs. Mild Steel

Comparative Report: A606 Type 4 Steel (Corten) vs. Mild Steel

Introduction

Steel is a versatile and robust material available in various types, each possessing unique attributes that tailor them to specific applications. This report delineates the differences between two prevalent types of steel - A606 Type 4 Steel (also known as Corten or weathering steel) and Mild Steel. We will discuss their composition, properties, applications, cost, and notably the differences in their compositional elements.

1. Composition

A606 Type 4 Steel (Corten)

Corten steel includes a combination of elements such as copper, chromium, nickel, and phosphorus. The unique blend contributes to its renowned self-weathering properties. The weathering process leads to a rust-like appearance due to a protective layer of iron oxide that forms and defends against further corrosion.

Mild Steel

Mild steel, a form of carbon steel, typically contains carbon concentrations between 0.05% and 0.30%. This makes it malleable and ductile, but with relatively low tensile strength. Mild steel does not contain the additional alloying elements seen in Corten, resulting in lower corrosion resistance.

2. Compositional Element Differences

Corten and mild steel exhibit significant differences in their elemental compositions.

A606 Type 4 Steel (Corten)

The defining feature of Corten steel is its alloying elements — copper, chromium, nickel, and phosphorus. These elements aid in forming a protective layer on the surface of the steel when exposed to the atmosphere, granting it a superior resistance to corrosion. This is a property mild steel lacks.

Mild Steel

Mild steel primarily consists of iron and carbon, without the addition of substantial amounts of alloying elements like Corten. It's this simplicity in composition that contributes to its excellent weldability, malleability, and ductility. However, this also means it is less resistant to corrosion compared to Corten.

3. Properties

A606 Type 4 Steel (Corten)

Corten steel is esteemed for its exceptional resistance to atmospheric corrosion. The protective layer that forms on the surface defends it against environmental conditions, substantially reducing corrosion. The steel develops a distinct reddish-brown appearance, which is often aesthetically valued.

Mild Steel

Mild steel boasts excellent weldability and machinability, making it a top choice for various fabrication processes. It is highly malleable and ductile, allowing for easy manipulation into a myriad of forms. However, it's less resistant to corrosion and requires additional treatment or coating for better durability.

4. Applications

A606 Type 4 Steel (Corten)

Corten steel finds extensive use in architectural applications due to its unique appearance and weather-resistant properties. Its applications extend to the manufacturing of freight containers, railway rolling stock, marine transportation, and wherever corrosion resistance is vital, such as bridges and heavy-duty structures.

Mild Steel

Mild steel is prevalent in the construction sector, providing the structural framework for numerous buildings and bridges. It is also used for manufacturing car bodies, appliances, and machinery parts, courtesy of its versatility, ease of welding, and cost-effectiveness.

5. Cost

A606 Type 4 Steel (Corten)

Corten steel, given its special alloying elements and the manufacturing process required to develop its unique properties, is generally pricier than mild steel.

Mild Steel

Mild steel, a simple low-carbon steel with less complicated manufacturing needs, is typically less expensive and more accessible than Corten steel.

Conclusion

Corten steel and mild steel, while both useful in various applications, differ significantly in composition, properties, uses, and cost. Corten's weathering ability and aesthetic qualities make it ideal for external applications exposed to the elements, while mild steel's affordability, machinability, and weldability make it a good choice for general-purpose applications. Choosing between the two will depend on the specific requirements of the application, taking into account factors such as exposure to the elements, aesthetic preferences, and budget.

Back to blog

Leave a comment

Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.